Just a few months ago, an NZZ journalist was expelled from the press gallery of the Council of States because she was wearing a sleeveless dress .
Finally, Hildbrand, in his pointed way, merely objected to the fact that the TV presenter had interviewed Federal Councillor Berset with her bare, tattooed arms. A question like that from a TV critic should be china rcs data allowed without an entire country going into a state of emergency. But the person asking the question must also be able to tolerate backlash - and René Hildbrand experienced this "first hand" - even if it sometimes goes below the belt. Keyword: the old man and the tattoos.
We at persoenlich.com were – like René Hildbrand himself – surprised by the passion with which the discussion was conducted. It shows three things: firstly, there really is still a need for TV columns, secondly, the question of "tattoo or not" is highly emotional and thirdly, you can't really control the most emotional topics. Despite sophisticated strategies and highly paid communication professionals.
The international YouTube advertising boycott or the No-Billag initiative are most likely more important and sustainable for our industry than a sleeveless dress worn by a "Glanz & Gloria" presenter. However, is also a suitable platform for such debates. For all sides. In our daily work, we always strive for the greatest possible fairness and allow different voices to be heard.