The photographic limit, or: What is good enough?

[bhasan01854]

Ultimately, cameras are tools that you use to complete a task. An old photographic saying is that in good conditions, such as enough light and a stationary subject, any mobile phone camera can produce a decent image.
Details such as the resolution of the sensor, the quality (and focal length) of the lens and the associated distance and thus perspective from the subject are the finer points.
However, if moving subjects such as children playing or animals are to be photographed when there is little light available in the evening, a digital camera can show its strengths. The larger sensor is more sensitive to light and the autofocus is more accurate.

If you then add a fast (interchangeable) lens, you can still take correctly brazil gambling data exposed pictures without image noise. However, some mobile phone cameras produce images of the quality of a surveillance camera.

handling and workflow
The big difference (and advantage) of a camera on your phone is that you always have it with you. You can use it to take spontaneous snapshots and then share them on Facebook or Instagram. If you use a mobile phone camera correctly, you can take great pictures in the right lighting conditions. Once you edit them a bit, even if it's using an Instagram filter, the differences to the "big" cameras become less. The smartphone can play to its strengths for video recordings : It is small and light, so you can record for longer periods of time, for example for vloggers.