The invalidity search is one of the most important
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2025 8:57 am
Things and Details during the Invalidation Search Process steps in the patent lifecycle, serving as a tool to challenge or defend the validity of a patent. While the primary purpose of an invalidity search is to find prior art that could invalidate a patent, the process itself is detailed, involving some key issues and some interesting details that many french polynesia b2b leads people don't expect. Below are some of the unique considerations and minor issues that can impact the invalidity search process. 4.1. Scope of the Search: Beyond Just Patents One of the most important aspects of an invalidity search is determining the scope of the search.
While it is easy to focus solely on patent literature, ignoring non-patent literature (NPL) can significantly limit the effectiveness of the search. 4.1.1. Main question: Non-Patent Literature (NPL): The scope of the search should include research papers, technical reports, conference proceedings, industry publications, and even online discussions or white papers. NPL is often more relevant than patents because it may contain information or innovations that are not patented but can be considered prior art. Details: In 2014, the European Patent Office (EPO) found that non-patent literature, including academic research articles, accounted for 40% of prior art used in opposition cases.
While it is easy to focus solely on patent literature, ignoring non-patent literature (NPL) can significantly limit the effectiveness of the search. 4.1.1. Main question: Non-Patent Literature (NPL): The scope of the search should include research papers, technical reports, conference proceedings, industry publications, and even online discussions or white papers. NPL is often more relevant than patents because it may contain information or innovations that are not patented but can be considered prior art. Details: In 2014, the European Patent Office (EPO) found that non-patent literature, including academic research articles, accounted for 40% of prior art used in opposition cases.